Supplement answer

 

TO: Court of Appeal in Nugaal Region =Garowe 

Subject: Appeal 
I, Lawyer Abdirisaq Yusuf Isma'il

, a member of Al-Furaat Law Firm and lawyer for Abdixakiin, hereby submit a supplementary response to the Honorable Court to which this letter is addressed, as follows: 

Introduction 
Mr. Chairman and Judges, as you can see from the Lawyer's appeal and the decision of the 1st Level Court of Garowe District, marked MDK/GN/ /2021, my client Abdixakiin opened a company called Hornjet, and was sued by the owners of a company he previously managed called Fahiye, and they argued that Horn Jett was a subsidiary of Fahiye, while Abdixakiin said that he owned and opened Horn Jett legally, however, they were angry about the work he did gone, the redemption of a place of work and the debt they had, they invented to say that we own the place and are a descendant of that even though they do not have the same name.
There is also all the evidence waiting to be found that the founder of the company, as stated in the legal document in which it was opened, is listed as C/xakiin.

General Explanation 

Mr. Chairman and Judges, after that, my client C/akin was illegally sued by the men he used to work for, who are forging a second time because they were disappointed in their first lawsuit and the court of first instance ruled that the company belonged to my client, and they now want to continue the forgery that has already failed. 

Mr. Chairman and Judges, as you can see from the lawyer's appeal, it is clear that he is not suing for a valid lawsuit, which is forgery and blatant misappropriation, full of malice, knowing that my client is more experienced in this business and they were afraid that all the customers would lose out on him, and that is hostility, malice and malice. We declare to this honorable court that my client opened his business and created this business in accordance with the law. After that, they made this false statement or fabricated a lawsuit, since they know that my client established it legally.

We also declare to the honorable court that we have all the evidence proving that my client owns that business and that he went through the legal process to open it

Sidoo kaleh waxay iyagu ku andacoonayaan in ay shirkaddaas ay tahay wadaag iyaga oo aan wax caddayn ah u haysan, haddaba waxaan makamadda ka codsanaynaa in ay soo bandhigaan hadday caddaymo rabitaanka heshiisku ka guntamo ah ay hayastaan sida uu qabo Qodobak 88aad ee XMS.

They also claim that they are partners in that company without any evidence, so we request the court to present if they have evidence of the intention of the agreement as per Article 88 of the XMS. Also, to produce a written or recorded document as per Article 89 of the XMS, even without that, they argue that they were a party to the agreement, which is a blatant and fabricated lie. 

Conclusion

Now, Mr. Chairman and judges, I respectfully request that you reject the lawyer and his appeal, which is not based on legal grounds, and you strongly support the decision of the 1st level court of Garowe District. 

Thank you.